In a variation on a familiar phrase, a federal trial court effectively has ruled that, in the context of a website posting customers\u2019 reviews of their retail buying experiences, \u201cyou can\u2019t blame the message board.\u201d<\/p>\n
In the case before the court, the defendant was an online consumer affairs company that allowed third parties to post commentary on the company\u2019s website about their impressions of various businesses. The plaintiffs were a group of franchised car dealers who went on the offensive because of several less than complimentary reviews of their dealerships by customers who posted reviews on the website.<\/p>\n
The dealerships\u2019 claims of defamation and tortious interference with business expectancy failed because of a provision in the federal Communications Decency Act. The statute, by its plain language, creates a federal immunity to any cause of action that would make providers of any interactive computer service liable for information originating with a third party user of the service. Specifically, the law precludes courts from entertaining claims that would place a computer service provider in a publisher\u2019s role.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In a variation on a familiar phrase, a federal trial court effectively has ruled that, in the context of a website posting customers\u2019 reviews of their retail buying experiences, \u201cyou can\u2019t blame the message board.\u201d In the case before the … Continue reading